Last year, I set up a poll asking readers whether or not they believed in vampires. Let's take a look at the results.
I adjusted the poll to reflect differing interpretations of vampires, which is a source of contention in itself. The informal tone I used for the various 'types' (and reader belief) can be boiled down to the following options:
- Traditional, yes ('Bloodsucking corpses? Sure!')
- No ('No such thing. At all')
- Undecided ('Mmm maybe...')
- Themselves, yes ('Believe in them? I am one!')
- Traditional, yes; psychic vampires, yes ('Yes, there are undead ones and psychic energy drainers')
- Psychic vampires, yes; traditional, no ('Not in the bloodsucking kind, but the ones that drain psychic energy, sure')
- Living vampires, yes ('Yes, they're living people who need to drink blood')
With hindsight, I probably should have split the polls into two, namely, whether or not a reader believed in vampires (a) and, if so, in what type (b). Nonetheless, the results were interesting in itself.
I'll work in descending order here, so I can tell you that the majority of voters - twenty four (24%) - don't believe in vampires, at all, but 21 voters (21%) believe they're living people who 'need to drink blood'. Meanwhile, 18 of you (18%) were undecided, tying with another 18 (18%) who don't believe in the traditional variety, but do believe in psychic vampires. However, 16 (16%) believed in both types and another fourteen (14%) believe in the traditional type. Lastly, thirteen (13%) believed that they, themselves, were vampires. Let's make those figures more palatable:
- Traditional, yes (14%)
- No (24%)
- Undecided (18%)
- Themselves, yes (13%)
- Traditional, yes; psychic vampires, yes (16%)
- Psychic vampires, yes; traditional, no (18%)
- Living vampires, yes (21%)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.